Friday, April 21, 2006
About Me
Check in Wikipedia.
Previous Posts
- multicellular computing
- Code for Unbreakable Quantum Encryption
- Quantum cryptography record broken
- Black holes: The ultimate quantum computers?
- First molecular-machine combination revealed
- Phone viruses: how bad is it?
- Steve Jobs on iPod
- Alan Turing: a snapshot
- Group: Yahoo help led to third dissident's arrest
- OECD urges more international cooperation on spam



2 Comments:
Did you actually read what you linked to?
Its final statement is: "I believe the book to be an important work of ontology."
Yea, sure sounds like he is dimissing it and suggesting you read something else.
Yes, I did read it. And no, unfortunately, a phrase out of context makes no difference. Anyone who reads Kurzweil's review will realise that it is not positive and that there are better and far more important work of ontology to read. My suggestion is to start with Kant.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home