Monday, February 16, 2009

Old Applications

Sometimes the old road should have never been left for the new one. Take the new skype (version 4.x): a disaster, a video-related bug (my guess, it was a problem for version 2.x as well) slowly eats up all your memory until the computer crashes. Second opinion? It's also big and ugly. So better go back to the old 3.8x. You can find it here http://www.oldapps.com/skype.php

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Web 2.0 vs. the Semantic Web: A Philosophical Assessment

Episteme, volume 6, 2009, Pages 25-37
DOI 10.3366/E174236000800052X

The paper develops some of the conclusions, reached in Floridi (2007), concerning the future developments of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and their impact on our lives.

The two main theses supported in that article were that, as the information society develops, the threshold between online and offline is becoming increasingly blurred, and that once there won't be any significant difference, we shall gradually re-conceptualise ourselves not as cyborgs but rather as inforgs, i.e. socially connected, informational organisms.

In this paper, I look at the development of the so-called Semantic Web and Web 2.0 from this perspective and try to forecast their future. Regarding the Semantic Web, I argue that it is a clear and well-defined project, which, despite some authoritative views to the contrary, is not a promising reality and will probably fail in the same way AI has failed in the past. Regarding Web 2.0, I argue that, although it is a rather ill-defined project, which lacks a clear explanation of its nature and scope, it does have the potentiality of becoming a success (and indeed it is already, as part of the new phenomenon of Cloud Computing) because it leverages the only semantic engines available so far in nature, us.

I conclude by suggesting what other changes might be expected in the future of our digital environment.

Wednesday, February 04, 2009

APA Barwise Prize

On Monday, I was waiting for my opponent to show up for a university squash match, but since he was a bit late I thought I could check my email. You cannot imagine my surprise, delight, confusion and useful energy (to which I owe a 3-0) when I read that the American Philosophical Association had select me to receive the Barwise Prize “for significant and sustained contributions to areas relevant to philosophy and computing [...] in recognition of his research on the philosophy of information”.

I will receive the award during the APA’s Eastern Meeting in NY in December 2009, when I will deliver the Barwise Lecture.

Amazing.

Previous winners are:
2007, David Chalmers (Australian National University);
2006, James H. Moor (Dartmouth College);
2005, Hubert Dreyfus (UC Berkeley);
2004, Deborah Johnson (University of Virginia);
2003, Daniel Dennett (Tufts University);
2002, Patrick Suppes (Stanford University).

Humbling.

The Construction of Personal Identities Online

Funded with £165,521 from the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), this research, entitled ‘The Construction of Personal Identities Online’, will explore how people reinvent themselves in virtual environments.

Information and communication technologies are building a new habitat (infosphere) in which people spend an increasing amount of time and how individuals construct and maintain their personal identities online (PIOs) is a problem of growing and pressing importance. Today, PIOs can be created and developed, as an ongoing work-in-progress, to provide experiential enrichment, expand, improve or even help to repair relationships with others and with the world, or enable imaginative projections (the "being in someone else's shoes" experience), thus fostering tolerance.

However, PIOs can also be mis-constructed, stolen, "abused", or lead to psychologically or morally unhealthy lives, causing a loss of engagement with the actual world and real people. The construction of PIOs affects how individuals understand themselves and the groups, societies and cultures to which they belong, both online and offline. PIOs increasingly contribute to individuals' self-esteem, influence their life-styles, and affect their values, moral behaviours and ethical expectations. Virtual environments are therefore transforming the nature of personal identity.

“Who are you online?” is a question with enormous practical implications, and yet, crucially, individuals as well as groups seem to lack a clear, conceptual understanding of who they are in the infosphere and what it means to be an ethically responsible informational agent online. The AHRC project will fill this serious gap in our understanding. It will last two years.

The research will be partly descriptive, in order to analyse what a PIO consists in, and partly prescriptive, in order to establish what a PIO ought to be. It will also rely on a new and unconventional methodology, by replacing thought experiments with experiments in silico (simulations) in Second Life.

The first stage of the research (semesters 1 and 2), will critically compare and evaluate current philosophical approaches to personal identity (PI) by analysing how far they may be extended to explain not only PI but also PIO, and then assessing the merits and shortcomings of their answers to the new questions posed by PIO. The hypotheses to be tested are that classic approaches to PI can contribute to our philosophical understanding of the new phenomenon of the construction of PIO; that, however, none of them will turn out to be fully satisfactory by itself, when exported from offline to online environments; and that this shortcoming can help us both to refine our understanding of PI and to develop a new approach to PIO.

Following the results obtained in the first stage, during the second stage (semesters 3 and 4) the research will address the questions raised by PIO, in order to complement the already available approaches to PI. The hypotheses to be tested are that the construction of PIO provides evidence in favour of a dynamic, interactive and distributed (that is, socially- or network-dependent) interpretation of PI, as a relational rather than a substantive property; that this new, interactive approach will resemble the capacity approach but in a system- rather than a single, agent-oriented way; and that this approach can successfully compete with the others in explaining PI while overcoming their limits when it comes to PIO.

Research results will be disseminated through scientific articles, reports and workshops.

The AHRC requests that "Acknowledgement of support from the AHRC accompanied by the AHRC logo must be included in any publications, publicity or marketing material – including printed material such as books, exhibition guides, press releases or electronic communications such as a website. In the case of broadcast coverage (radio or television) of research that AHRC has funded, acknowledgement should also be given where possible." and that the following description should be made available: “Each year the AHRC provides funding from the Government to support research and postgraduate study in the arts and humanities, from archaeology and English literature to design and dance. Only applications of the highest quality and excellence are funded and the range of research supported by this investment of public funds not only provides social and cultural benefits but also contributes to the economic success of the UK. For further information on the AHRC, please see our website www.ahrc.ac.uk ”