Thursday, May 15, 2008

From New York to York

Life can be ironic: within a week, I managed to be in New York, US and then in York, UK.
It even took me some time to realise the odd coincidence. I must be tired.

In York, I gave a presentation at the meeting
E-Learning in Dialogue: Innovative Teaching and Learning in Philosophy and Religious Studies.
I enjoyed several of the other presentations and I was sorry to have to leave early.

The problem: an overall impression that e-learning has not advanced much since the eighties.

The solution: trying to reinvent e-learning as a way of teaching humanity to cope with the new informational agents and environments in which they spend some much time. Many people seemed to like the idea.

A Film for Philosophy

Click on the title.
Just replace the elevator-background music with this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBAasek8NR4
and enjoy!

Saturday, May 10, 2008

In NY

Being sick is often a good chance to stay alone with yourself, without an agenda to fulfill. Being stuck in a city because your flight leaves only 24 hours later is a more pleasant way to obtain the same goal. And if the city is then NY, it might be a blessing.

The temptation to eat hamburgers in my hotel room, typing on this computer all the time, had to be resisted. And it was. I went for a long walk and then checked what's new in American Contemporary Art. My lucky day: the Whitney Museum houses one of the world's foremost collections of twentieth-century American art, and the Biennial was on.

Unmissable, if one is around. Not only for the single pieces (I enjoyed many of them, especially Walead Beshty, Jedediah Caesar, Charles Long) but also for the overview it affords on today's America art. Not many novelties, perhaps even a lack of clear ideas and purpose, but a tangible sense of search for new ways of expressions.

Probably most of the objects will soon (one hope) be forgotten. And the usual, obsessive, self-referential mumbling of people who have nothing to say, but think that saying this much, in some smart-assish way, can fill the gap, makes one puke. Who cares! Shut-up, please. Don't waste broadband. White noise and zeros acquire meaning only when there is a message or ones to which they can be contrasted. But then, it is the curators' fault if sometimes silence is not respected (Frances Stark).

One simple thing that seems to have been lost is a clear grasp of the inevitably informational nature of art. Art is a form of communication, where there is
  • a sender,
  • a message,
  • a code,
  • an encoding process,
  • a medium,
  • a communication,
  • a receiver, and
  • a final decoding by a receiver.
The sender might be less obvious than it looks (it's the artist, or the museum that ordered the piece, the foundation that provided financial support for it, the Church or Party or Business that commissioned it, the culture that actually produced it...). The message has often many layers and meanings. And the receiver may be hardly identifiable. But these, as well as the other components, are there anyway, whether the artist likes it or not. And the only way to eliminate them is to stop being an artist and going for a walk.

So it is bad, tricky, perhaps disingenuous or simply silly and meaningless to try to avoid the informational nature of art. All rules can be broken but the rule that there will be rules, such as the rule of breaking all rules. Trivial and inevitable truism. One may wish to disrespect, bypass, destroy, annihilate, overcome, disregard, chew and spit out the informational model... but all in vain, for no art is possible without such a structure, let alone an art that denies it.

The best expressions of contemporary art seems to me those that take new and further advantage of the informational model, with innovative techniques, contents, a diversificatoin of senders and receivers, of codes and encoding/decoding processes. Seen in this way, visual-artistic expressions are boundless as music and literature are. The only trouble is that you need to have something interesting to say. And this is not common.

Walking back. A ruminating reflection on silence. On how we miss it so much. Because we cannot listen to ourselves and hence we become strangers to ourselves. The park was blasted by salsa music to force people to jump and exercise at the rhythm of a different kind of sunshine. It ruined the atmosphere.

Information Ethics Roundtable 2008

This Year's Topic of the IER was Information Ethics and its Applications.

I enjoyed the meeting both socially and intellectually. The IRS is a great initiative and the organizers (Tony Doyle, Program Chair, Don Fallis, Kay Mathiesen, and Catherine Womack) have done a great job.

The idea of a full, one-day meeting is attractive, and the careful organization of talks with invited speakers and commentators, makes the debate fruitfully challenging. I certainly have learnt a lot and realised that I have even more to learn.

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

The information society as a neo-bartering society

We live in a neo-bartering society (www.swapace.co.uk).

On any sterling banknote, one can still read “I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of...”, but the fact is that Britain abandoned the gold standard in 1931, so you should not expect to receive any yellow stuff in exchange. The Euro, more seriously, promises nothing. It might be one of the reasons why we are so reluctant to adopt it in this country.

Since all currencies are free floating nowadays, money may well be just a pile of digits. Indeed, when Northern Rock collapsed, several banks in Second Life (SL) followed suit. Players rushed to close their accounts because SL is not Monopoly: the exchange (technically, redemption) rate is around 260 L$ (Linden Dollar) to 1 $ (secondlife.com/whatis/economy-market.php). This is interesting because it transforms providers of in-game currencies, like Linden Lab, into issuers of electronic money. And since the threshold between online and offline is constantly being eroded, one is left wondering when some kind of regulation will be extended to such companies as well. It seems unfair that no government went out of its way to support users who lost all their L$.

True, at the moment you cannot swap L$ for any hard stuff in first life. For this, you need a Nectar card (www.nectar.com). In this case, the neo-bartering nature of the information society is even more evident.

As with all loyalty cards, one earns points by spending. While the money spent might not be yours (suppose you drive a company car and your travelling expenses are reimbursed), the points are as good as cash: a DVD from Blockbuster costs only 500 points (note Sainsbury’s gives you a worse deal). Clearly, bartering and online swapping are based on fair rules, trust and honesty. But we live in a sad valley of cheaters, where the neologism swaplifting (swapping + shoplifting) is becoming popular.

The simplest scam is to agree to a swap and then disappear without honouring your side of the deal. There are, however, slightly less elementary ways of playing the system. Suppose you buy a product for £1000, register the 2000 points on your Nectar card, then return the object purchased and get a full refund. You just made the equivalent of 4 rented DVDs (approximately £16) at no risk, as it is unlikely that the points will be reclaimed. This is dishonest, for you are supposed to contact Nectar “if you believe points have been incorrectly awarded to your account”, but it’s probably not illegal.

Or consider those loyalty cards that offer a once-only, 10% discount when you register your first purchase (www.debenhams.com). Go to the local retailer looking affluent and well-dressed. Once you have accumulated say £300 of potential shopping, make sure that you are invited to register for the loyalty card. Agree, somewhat reluctantly, but provide some incorrect details regarding your credit card (your old address will do). After several attempts, the registration will fail. You will look perplexed. The manager will be embarrassed. Apologises will be exchanged and it is very likely that they will give you the discount anyway (otherwise, you can still walk out without buying anything). You just gained £30, as you can now get another 10% discount next time you register.

All this may seem applicable only to nerds, middle-managers and desperate housewives, but even high-flyers can barter. They just use frequent-flyer miles. According to The Economist, in January 2005 “the total stock of unredeemed miles was worth more than all the dollar bills in circulation”, and you can exchange them for almost anything (www.points.com). The temptation is to pocket the miles earned through someone else’s money.

Last February, for example, the Parliamentary Standards watchdog complained that the Commons Speaker, Michael Martin, had used air miles earned with public money for his family, the ultimate proof (Mr Martin, not the watchdog) that Britain is an advanced information society.

Of course, one day all barriers between points-systems will be lifted. People will then use only World Credits (www.fireflywiki.org/Firefly/FireflyMoney) to purchase anything in the whole universe, independently of ordinal numbers. I look forward to being able to swap my L$ for a socially responsible coffee (starbucks.co.uk/en-GB/_Card).

Monday, March 17, 2008

MA by Research in Philosophy at the University of Hertfordshire in conjunction with a research assistantship

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE (UK)

MA BY RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESEARCH ASSISTANTSHIP

2008/09 Programme

The Department of Philosophy at the University of Hertfordshire is inviting applications for a one-year position for the Master by Research in Philosophy for the academic year 2008-09.

The successful candidate will pursue research in the area of information/computer ethics, under the supervision of Professor Luciano Floridi, and will be eligible for a research assistantship, in order to work on the international Project “Information and communication technologies, inter-firm networking and innovativeness", funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia. This will require spending three months in Lisbon during the academic year 2008-09.

The Research Assistantship will be awarded (for one year) and governed by the rules of FCT (http://www.fct.mctes.pt/pt/apoios/formacao/ambitoprojectos) and the School of Economics and Management of the Catholic University of Portugal, FCEE-Católica (http://www.fcee.ucp.pt).

The successful candidate will become a member of the GPI, the research Group in Philosophy of Information at the University of Hertfordshire (http://philosophyofinformation.net/centre/gpi/) and join a research joint-venture composed by FCEE-Católica, Carnegie Mellon University (Department of Engineering and Public Policy) Bocconi University (CESPRI - Centre of Research on Innovation and Internationalization), in collaboration with the Research Chair In Philosophy of Information at the University of Hertfordshire (http://www.philosophyofinformation.net/).

The student will be expected to develop and participate in a research project in applied ethics aimed at analyzing the impact of information and communication technologies on firms’ innovation capabilities.

The monthly stipend will be € 980.00/month, according to the FCT regulations, for a candidate already holding a previous M.Sc. or € 745.00/month for a candidate with only a first degree. The Assistantship will also cover expenses for some travelling.

Deadline: 1st of May 2008.

For further information on how to apply please contact:

Janice Turner, J.1.Turner@herts.ac.uk

Institute Research Administrator, SSAHRI (Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities Research Institute), De Havilland Campus - Room R312

University of Hertfordshire

Hatfield, AL10 9AB

Tel: 01707 285628

Fax: 01707 285611

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Against Digital Ontology

It seems fashionable these days to talk of a digital ontology. Fashionable, but mistaken. Kant had already shown that any attempt to interpret the intrinsic nature of the world as either discrete (digital) or continuous (analogue) is meaningless. He was right.

In an article, just accepted for publication in Synthese, I argue against digital ontology. I do so in order to make room for an informational ontology (see the post below, Wednesday, February 20, 2008). If you are curious, you can read the preprint online.

And here is the abstract:

The paper argues that digital ontology (the ultimate nature of reality is digital, and the universe is a computational system equivalent to a Turing Machine) should be carefully distinguished from informational ontology (the ultimate nature of reality is structural), in order to abandon the former and retain only the latter as a promising line of research.

Digital vs. analogue is a Boolean dichotomy typical of our computational paradigm, but digital and analogue are only “modes of presentation” of Being (to paraphrase Kant), that is, ways in which reality is experienced and/or conceptualised by an epistemic agent at a given level of abstraction.

A preferable alternative is provided by an informational approach to structural realism, according to which knowledge of the world is knowledge of its structures. The most reasonable ontological commitment turns out to be in favour of an interpretation of reality as the totality of structures dynamically interacting with each other.

The paper is the first part (the pars destruens) of a two-part piece of research. The pars construens, entitled “A Defence of Informational Structural Realism”, was previously published in Synthese.

CFP: APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, special issue on 'The Ontological Status of Web-Based Objects'

The APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers organizes a special issue on 'The Ontological Status of Web-Based Objects'.

Contributions of up to 3,000 words should be emailed to the editor, Prof. Peter Boltuc pbolt1@uis.edu, by July 01/2008.

The First Roskilde Science Sunrise Conference 2008

Roskilde University is the host of the annual Roskilde Science Sunrise Conference.

The Science Sunrise initiative has been installed to provide an international forum for discussing important new scientific developments and the broader societal, cultural, political, ethical and other challenges such developments may bring about.

The First Roskilde Science Sunrise Conference 2008

Surviving Ourselves: The Human Condition

August 13-15, 2008, Roskilde University, Denmark

How are we to act and interact in the century ahead? Shaping the future and grappling with its complexities is a challenge to ourselves and at the same time a matter of surviving ourselves since history seems to teach us that we are as much problem makers as problem solvers.

What might be the impact on the human condition of two major scientific breakthroughs about to be announced:

(1) the laboratory creation of primitive life, and

(2) the possibility of genetic recreation of dead DNA ("awakening the dead")?

By bringing together some of the most renowned politicians, scientists and public figures together this first Roskilde Sunrise Conference provides a unique forum for discussing some of the scientific, ethical and political consequences of these two new possibilities for the human race in the 21st century.

Invited speakers:

Mark Bedau / Reed University
David Deamer / UC Santa Cruz
Drew Endy / MIT
Gerald L. Epstein / Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington DC
P. Luigi Luisi / University of Rome
Donald W. Pfaff / Rockefeller University
Pamela Silver / Harvard University, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
Steen Rasmussen, FLiNT Center, SDU, Denmark
Robert M. Friedman, Vice President for Public Policy, J. Craig Venter Institute

For further information, please visit our website: http://sunrise.ruc.dk

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

GPI & IEG Newsletter

The first issue of the new, joint Newsletter of the GPI (research Group in Philosophy of Information, UH) and IEG (Information Ethics research Group, Oxford) is available online at:

http://philosophyofinformation.net/centre/gpi/newsletter.html

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

The informational nature of being


What is the ultimate nature of reality?

In an article just published in Synthese, I argue in favour of an informational ontology. With a slogan: "To be is to be information".

Well,, it's a bit more complicated than that, so, if you are curious, you can read the preprint online.

And here is the abstract:

This is the revised version of an invited keynote lecture delivered at the 1st Australian Computing and Philosophy Conference (CAP@AU; the Australian National University in Canberra, 31 October – 2 November, 2003).

The paper is divided into two parts.

The first part defends an informational approach to structural realism. It does so in three steps.

  1. First, it is shown that, within the debate about structural realism (SR), epistemic (ESR) and ontic (OSR) structural realism are reconcilable. It follows that a version of OSR is defensible from a structuralist-friendly position.
  2. Second, it is argued that a version of OSR is also plausible, because not all relata (structured entities) are logically prior to relations (structures).
  3. Third, it is shown that a version of OSR is also applicable to both sub-observable (unobservable and instrumentally-only observable) and observable entities, by developing its ontology of structural objects in terms of informational objects.
The outcome is informational structural realism, a version of OSR supporting the ontological commitment to a view of the world as the totality of informational objects dynamically interacting with each other.

The paper has been discussed by several colleagues and, in the second half, ten objections that have been moved to the proposal are answered in order to clarify it further.